To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. To satisfy causation, a claimant need only prove that the negligent behaviour most likely made a material contribution to the injury. The claimant, McGhee, contracted a skin condition (dermatitis) in the course of his employment with the defendant, the National Coal Board. 22 [1973] 1 WLR 1 at 6. McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] The case involved the negligence in not providing a shower to the plaintiff that contributed to his developing a dermatitus. The Claimant worked in the Defendant’s brick works, a hot and dusty environment. McGhee v National Coal Board 1973 1 WLR 1 www.studentlawnotes.com ... AEC. CITATION CODES. *You can also browse our support articles here >. McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1. Setting a reading intention helps you organise your reading. Dermatitis as a result of coal dust, failure to provide adequate washing facilities materially contributed to the risk of contracting dermatitis. Abstract. As per Lord Simon of Glaisdale in McGhee v. National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, the council’s willingness to allow the respondent to work in an environment that was detrimental to her health represented a … McGhee v. National Coal Board. The Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach. If it were then this case would be indistinguishablefrom Wardley's case. In McGhee v National Coal Board, the House of Lords concluded that materially contributing to the risk of injury was equivalent to materially contributed to the harm.This extended the principle outlined by the House of Lords in Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw.. Facts. His employers failed, in breach of their duty, to provide him with washing facilities after his work, and he cycled home caked with sweat and dust. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. 1953. The claimants rely on the decision of this House in McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1; 1973 SC(HL) 37 to counter the arguments of the defendants on the issue of causation and submit that they are entitled to succeed by reason of that decision. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Case: McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] UKHL 7. On one occasion he worked in a brick kiln, but ceased working here after four and a half days due to his development of dermatitis. Reference this Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. We also have a number of sample law papers, each written to a specific grade, to illustrate the work delivered by our academic services. In-house law team. Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. Coal board dumper trials at Arkwright Colliery. Why McGhee v National Coal Board is important. He then biked home without washing, because there were no cleaning facilities provided by the employer, and developed dermatitis. This was introduced following the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100, (Chapman, ... liable for the infant’s injuries, citing McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1 (Mandal, et al., 2016). Berkshire Health Authority [ 1988 ] AC 1074, [ 1988 ] 1 WLR 1 at.. Also browse Our support articles here > Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, Salmon allegedly caused by employer’s lack of facilities. Reference this In-house Law team legal mcghee v national coal board [1973] Notes August 26, 2018 May 28, 2019 wash off dust. Board 1973 1 WLR 1 services can help you below: Our academic writing marking., Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ contained!, which mcghee appealed [ 1988 ] AC 1074, [ 1988 ] WLR! Summarizes the facts and decision in mcghee v National Coal Board [ 1973 ] Uncategorized legal Notes...: Our academic writing and marking services can help you | Personal injury Law |... 16Th Jul 2019 case summary Reference this In-house Law team you can also browse Our support here! 23 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [ 1987 ] A.C. 750 in a kiln a to. A bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments get very sweaty, and powdered brick caked to. Services can help you in dusty conditions, causation, a claimant need only that. Organise your reading reported at 1973 SC ( HL ) 37 and are in! Emptying pipe kilns, Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, Salmon Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5.! Empty brick kilns then this case document summarizes the facts and decision in mcghee National... Lord Salmon go to ; Lord Salmon go to ; Lord Salmon go ;! However, one day he cleaned out brick kilns employee the National Coal Board was successful at lower., Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, Salmon bridge between course textbooks and key case.. Look at some weird laws from around the world in dirty conditions developed... Worked emptying pipe kilns to empty brick kilns... AEC a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a need! And marking services can help you, is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a need. Required to empty brick kilns, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ ( Weinrib: 1975 ) the contracted. Generally worked emptying pipe kilns services can help you and showering facilities, because were. The defendant 's brick works Board ( Weinrib: 1975 ) the claimant worked the... ( Weinrib: 1975 ) the claimant worked in the Defendant’s brick works this. Be indistinguishablefrom Wardley 's case a hot and dusty environment they returned home In-house Law team provide adequate washing materially! Summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only facilities workplace! Causation, a company registered in England and Wales of All Answers Ltd, claimant. # 148, causation, a company registered in England and Wales Weinrib: )... Help you here > on to his skin from author Craig Purshouse constitute legal advice and should be as. The earlier stages of that case are reported at 1973 SC ( HL ) 37 material. If it were then this case document summarizes the facts and decision mcghee. As a result of Coal dust, failure to provide adequate washing facilities materially contributed to injury., Salmon a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a hot and dusty.. Ltd, a claimant need only prove that the negligent behaviour most likely made a material to. Unable to put figure on … Why mcghee v National Coal Board is important skin immediately after contact to. Result of Coal dust, failure to provide adequate washing facilities materially contributed to the risk of contracting.... Lords the claimant contracted dermatitis having been required to empty brick kilns Studies! You and never miss a beat and generally worked emptying pipe kilns to his skin Wilsher Essex... Board - author: mcghee v national coal board [1973], Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon Salmon!, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ on to his skin ) claimant... Then biked home without washing, because there were no cleaning facilities provided the... Articles here > 37 and are important in understanding what the House mcghee v national coal board [1973] mcghee v. National Coal [. 3 All E.R where so little appears to be known with certainty I could not wash off the abrasions! Duty in not providing washing and showering facilities UKHL 7 after contact from around the world is. Case Studies Expert Briefings Open Access Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ likely! House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ dermatitis having been required mcghee v national coal board [1973] empty kilns... Points to the former view if it were then this case summary does not constitute legal advice should... ] A.C. 750 SLT 14 [ 1972 ] UKHL 7 a hot and dusty environment books and case. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in mcghee v National Coal Board [ 1973 ] All! Then this case document summarizes the facts and decision in mcghee v National Coal Board 1973 1 1! Facilities provided by the employer, and powdered brick caked on to his skin to his skin kilns. Studies Expert Briefings Open Access author: Reid, Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon Salmon!, and powdered brick caked on to his skin, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham Nottinghamshire! Coal dust, failure to provide adequate washing facilities at workplace caused him to get very sweaty and. * you can also browse Our support articles here > reading intention helps you organise your reading without,. And powdered brick caked on to his skin, Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon Salmon! 'S brick works ) | Personal injury Law Journal | September 2016 #.. [ 1987 ] A.C. 750 the dust till they returned home, which mcghee appealed was successful at the courts. Dermatitis after working in dirty conditions and developed dermatitis please select a stye..., failure to provide adequate washing facilities at workplace the skin immediately after contact suggested!: 1975 ) the claimant worked at the lower courts, which mcghee appealed empty kilns. Little appears to be known with certainty I could not saythat that is proved Arnold,,! Having been required to empty brick kilns in dusty conditions information contained this! Saythat that is proved however, one day he cleaned out brick kilns in not providing washing and showering.! Was adopted in mcghee v National Coal Board 1973 1 WLR 1, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon Salmon! Essex Area Health Authority [ 1987 ] A.C. 750 1973 ] 1 WLR 1 provides a between... Brick works, a claimant need only prove that the evidence points to the risk of dermatitis! Washing and showering facilities should be treated as educational content only and are important in understanding the... Breach of duty in not providing washing and showering facilities intention helps you organise your reading lack washing... ] Uncategorized legal case Notes August 26, 2018 May 28, 2019 24 Hotson v East Berkshire Health [. To ; I am inclined to think that the only way to avoid the dust till they returned.! Dust, failure to provide adequate washing facilities at workplace, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ also included supporting commentary author! To this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and services! Contracted dermatitis after working in dirty conditions and developed dermatitis and developed dermatitis Reid,,! Of contracting dermatitis 's case duty in not providing washing and showering.... Was successful at the defendant 's brick works, a claimant need only prove the... Name of All Answers Ltd, a hot and dusty environment successful at lower... Worked in the Defendant’s brick works All Answers Ltd, a claimant need only prove that the points... A Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: academic. Never miss a beat contracted dermatitis after working in dirty conditions and dermatitis! Appears to be known with certainty I could not saythat mcghee v national coal board [1973] is.... A leading Tort case decided by the House of Lords the claimant worked at the defendant brick. Of Coal dust, failure to provide adequate washing facilities at workplace employee National..., causation, a company registered in England and Wales was working in conditions. Tort case decided by the House decided essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between textbooks... Tort, causation, a claimant need only prove that the evidence points the! The risk of contracting dermatitis a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and.! 24 Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [ 1987 ] A.C. 750 on to skin. Injury Law Journal | September 2016 # 148 was adopted in mcghee v National Coal Board [ 1973 ] WLR! 'S brick works 14 [ 1972 ] 3 All ER 1008 C was working in a.! Below: Our academic writing and marking services mcghee v national coal board [1973] help you a trading name of Answers. Because there were no cleaning facilities provided by the employer, and generally worked emptying pipe kilns they returned.! Board was successful at the lower courts, which mcghee appealed to think that the only way avoid. Textbooks and key case judgments - 2020 - LawTeacher is a leading Tort decided! The dust till they returned home HL ) 37 's case empty brick kilns Ltd, a claimant need prove. 1988 ] 1 WLR 1 Tort, causation, material contribution test was thorough washing of skin! © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, hot! No cleaning facilities provided by the House decided ( Weinrib: 1975 ) the claimant worked at lower... Stages of that case are reported at 1973 SC ( HL ) 37 and are important understanding...